Managing Director, BDO Alto Limited:
Yes, just to clarify, and it is in our written submission, the material that was leaked to the newspaper was not a BDO work product. I cannot comment on what was leaked to the media. As again we say in our written submission, we provide you with copies of the correspondence with Home Affairs on 5th October 2009. This matter was clearly brought to our attention. We were concerned that anything that was related to our review was finding its way into the national media. As I say, it was not a BDO report. There was not an interim report at that point in time. What appears to have been leaked were, again, some of the early drafts of some of [Police Consultant]’s work. He might want to say something about that.
Deputy R.G Le Hérrisier:
As a result of your subsequent inquiries and your contact with Home Affairs, did you come to a considered judgment as to how it had occurred and who had done it?
Managing Director, BDO Alto Limited:
I think, when we had an opportunity to have a look at the article that had been published on the Mail on Sunday, it became clear to us what material was being quoted from. Therefore, from our perspective, we were able to narrow down where that material had gone, but as I say it was not a BDO interim report. It was not an interim report at all, in fact.
Police Consultant:
The circumstances of the source are as set down in my written submission. The source was [retired D/Superintendent]. He has admitted that to me in telephone conversations. He first telephoned me about a week or so after the article appeared. I had already worked out that it was probably him.
Police Consultant:
I deplore what he did. I have told him I deplore what he did. In terms of why he did it, you would have to ask him. He says - so what he told me - and he has repeated that in recent telephone conversations that he has made to me arising out of the establishment of this Panel that he did not give copies of my written work, but he disclosed the contents of some of them to a reporter. It was not BDO at all. It is not me. It was not Wiltshire or [then Acting Police Chief]. It was [retired D/Superintendent].
4 comments:
Rico.
Here is a comment on left on Stuart's site earlier.
"Here's where I'm a little confused. In 2008 you held a public meeting at the Town Hall and CTV filmed it all. When I asked why they didn't (and still haven't) broadcast ANY OF IT they told me that you were a declared candidate in the Bi-Election and it would break OFCOM regulations if they were to give you, what could be viewed as "favourable" coverage.
Firstly the nomination meeting had not yet taken place at that time so you were not "officially" a declared candidate.
Secondly how is it that now you are an "official" candidate they can have you up as their headline "news"?
Is it OK by OFCOM regulations to give "official" candidates "un-favourable" coverage but not "unofficial" candidates ANY kind of coverage? "
The public meeting in question is HERE
Channel Television certainly are starting to make a name for themselves.
Oh! by the way, the "reason" (according to CTV's "Political Reporter) they never mentioned anything about Gradwell allegedly leaking confidential data to the national "journalist" when Le Marquand mentioned it in the States is because the political reporter "didn't hear it".
Bl--dy priceless!
Rico.
BL--DY PRICELESS
Have you had a reply from channel tv yet Rico?
No nothing
rs
Post a Comment